Korea Business Review · Section
KBR NEWS
Free
ISSUE BRIEFING
Gasoline Prices Heading Down to the 1,800-Won Range? Government Cuts Maximum Oil Prices for the First Time
The South Korean government has lowered the 7th ceiling of the maximum oil pricing system—introduced after the Middle East war—by 150 won per liter for the first time, bringing gasoline down to 1,784 won, diesel to 1,773 won, and kerosene to 1,380 won. This adjustment reflects easing tensions in the Middle East, including falling international oil prices and the normalization of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, marking the first downward revision in 105 days since the system's implementation. While the government expects pump prices for gasoline to drop from the early 2,000-won range to the 1,800-won range, there may be a time lag before consumers feel the impact due to existing high-priced inventories. The maximum pricing system has been praised for its inflation-defense effects while simultaneously facing criticism for side effects such as distorted price signals, refinery losses, and expanding fiscal burdens. The government does not plan to terminate the system immediately and will apply the 7th pricing tier for 4 weeks, though discussions on an exit strategy could gain traction depending on future oil price stability and supply chain normalization.
이지영 기자 · 06/27/2026
Read more →
ISSUE BRIEFING
Sole Proprietor Loan Overdue Dues Reach 14.6 Trillion Won… Era of 1 Million Closings, Alley Businesses Surviving on Debt
김민경 책임기자 · 06/24/2026
DEEP ANALYSIS
Another Workplace After Clocking Out: A Growing Number of 4050 Breadwinners Are Working Second Jobs
강지혜 선임기자 · 06/24/2026
ISSUE BRIEFING
Government to Clear KRW 2.2 Trillion in Small Business Guaranteed Debt, Reopening Paths to Recovery Blocked by Arrears
이우리 선임기자 · 06/22/2026
DEEP ANALYSIS
Semiconductor Exports Surpass 41%, KOSPI Breaks 9,000 for the First Time... Exchange Rates and Interest Rates Move in Tandem
최수진 기자 · 06/22/2026
DEEP ANALYSIS
Not Just Due to Regulations: 4 Reasons Why Uber and Grab Do Not Work in South Korea
The absence of Uber and Grab cannot be explained by a single line stating they were blocked by regulations. While private car ride-sharing services like UberX are illegal under the Passenger Transport Service Act, Uber remains in a transformed state as a 'taxi-hailing app' rather than fully withdrawing, and Grab never entered South Korea in the first place. The 'Tada incident' was a critical turning point; even though the court ruled it legal, the passage of the anti-Tada law in the National Assembly in 2020 and its dismissal by the Constitutional Court solidified the reality that mobility services operating outside the traditional framework of taxis struggle to survive in South Korea. Uber's sluggish performance was also a strategic miscalculation. Its 'occupy first, negotiate later' approach clashed with the organized taxi industry and dense public transportation, whereas Kakao secured over 90% of the market with 'Kakao T,' which embraced existing taxis (recording approximately 13.58 million MAU as of February 2026). Uber's counterattack in 2026 also failed to narrow the gap; users who briefly increased through the Uber One subscription and Naver partnership dwindled back to about 650,000 as the 'Naver effect' faded, leading Uber to pivot toward niche strategies such as foreign and tourist demand and 'Uber rental.' Autonomous driving has emerged as a variable that will shake all balances anew. With robotaxis becoming commonplace in the U.S. and China, and the Bank of Korea suggesting regulatory relaxation, the full-scale realization of robotaxis will inevitably force a reexamination of the logic behind the current Passenger Transport Act, which has blocked private vehicle operations.
강지혜 선임기자 · 06/18/2026
ISSUE BRIEFING
The AI Job Threat Started with the 'Door That Closes First': Data-Identified Occupations Most Vulnerable to Shaking
In May 2026, U.S. layoffs reached their highest level since the pandemic at 97,000, with about 40% citing AI as the primary reason (surging from 7% in January to 40% in May), although prudent voices suggest AI may sometimes be used as a convenient excuse. The first sign of the AI shock is not mass layoffs, but rather barriers to entry for youth; employment rates for 22- to 25-year-olds in high AI-exposure jobs in the U.S. fell by about 14% compared to 2022. Clerical and administrative jobs are being most directly shaken: about 86% of the roughly 6.1 million high-exposure, low-adaptability workers in the U.S. are women, and similar signals are being captured in Europe (such as Ireland at 7% and Meta cutting 8,000 jobs). In South Korea, youth jobs shrank by 211,000 over the past three years (208,000 of which were in high AI-exposure industries) while jobs for those in their 50s increased by 209,000, leading the Bank of Korea to diagnose this as 'seniority-biased technological change'—matching the direction seen in the U.S. However, the WEF projects 92 million jobs replaced and 170 million created by 2030 (a net increase of 78 million), indicating that the core question is not whether jobs will disappear, but who will adapt first and how.
류현진 선임기자 · 06/16/2026
KBR News
Why Claude Fable 5 Stopped: It Was Not a 'Technical Bug,' but a US Government Export Control Order
Anthropic's top-tier AI models, 'Claude Fable 5' and 'Claude Mythos 5,' were blocked for global users just three days after launch due to US government export control directives. Although the core of the guideline was 'blocking foreign access,' Anthropic explained that it was technically difficult to apply this selectively, forcing them to shut down access for all users. While the government took issue with the potential for 'jailbreaking' to bypass model safety guardrails, Anthropic countered that the vulnerability in question was exaggerated and exists across the industry as a whole. This incident demonstrates that frontier AI models are no longer mere technical services, but direct targets of national security and export controls. It also confirms that Korean companies relying excessively on specific AI models or single suppliers may be exposed to service disruption risks resulting from policy shifts.
KBR 편집부 · 06/15/2026
DEEP ANALYSIS
Seoul Metropolitan Area Apartments Clash Between Record-Breaking Regulations and Record-Breaking Supply Shortages
Following the June 27 loan regulations and October 15 expansion of regulated zones in the second half of 2025, combined with the resumption of the heavy capital gains tax surcharge in May 2026, unprecedented multi-layered regulations are currently operating in the Seoul metropolitan area. However, one year after the resumption of the heavy tax surcharge, apartment listings in Seoul have decreased by about 10%, while price growth has actually expanded to the 0.2-0.3% range, demonstrating a phenomenon of 'price strength amid locked listings.' The jeonse (lump-sum lease) market is also unstable, with Seoul's cumulative apartment jeonse increase reaching approximately six times that of last year (3.77%), underpinning sales prices from below. The root cause is a shortage of supply: Seoul's move-in volume for 2026 is projected to drop 48% year-on-year to about 16,000 households, marking the lowest level nationwide in 13 years. As strengthening holding taxes, such as raising the comprehensive real estate holding tax and reducing long-term holding special deductions, are being discussed as the next regulatory cards, deliberations on tax law amendments in the second half of the year are expected to be a watershed moment for the market.
강지혜 선임기자 · 06/11/2026
ISSUE BRIEFING
The Paradox of the 40 Trillion Won Delivery Era: Why Rider Incomes Are Moving Backward
While the delivery market transaction volume grew 10.9% year-on-year to reach an annual scale of 40 trillion won as of January 2026, riders' perceived incomes have actually decreased, leading to a paradox where protests are even calling for a minimum wage per delivery. Although Baemin announced that the average monthly income of riders increased to 3.93 million won, this is based on total gross income before cost deductions for full-time riders working 40 hours or more per week, creating a wide gap with the actual net income of many riders who must bear fuel and insurance costs. The first cause is the free-delivery competition among platforms that began in earnest in 2024, where cost-cutting pressures were passed on to rider delivery fees, lowering the unit price per delivery and increasing labor intensity through bundled deliveries. The second and third causes are oversupply due to the influx of two-job workers amid a youth employment slump, and a cost-shifting structure featuring opaque algorithmic dispatch and straight-line distance delivery fee calculations. Entering 2026, as discussions on a minimum wage per delivery, the implementation of a presumptive employee status system for platform workers, and legislation on fee transparency gain momentum, the era of 'earning as much as you run' has passed, and the very rules of unit pricing and distribution have been brought to the negotiation table.
류현진 선임기자 · 06/11/2026
