management-article
When a Crisis Hits, What Kind of Leader Are You: "Who is at fault?" vs. "What went wrong?" — The defining question of an organization's fate
When problems arise, the first question a leader asks typically splits into "Who was in charge?" and "What happened?", through which members learn how the organization handles mistakes. Data such as Gallup's 2026 report showing 22% manager engagement, DDI's 2025 survey showing 29% direct supervisor trust, and a September 2025 survey by Daejeon Metropolitan Corporation where "Take responsibility for this yourself" ranked as the number one taboo phrase, indicate that the costs of blame-driven leadership are rising. Edmondson's 1996 hospital study and 1999 study of 51 teams, along with Google's Project Aristotle, consistently confirm that teams with high psychological safety report and learn from more mistakes. Deming's 94-to-6 estimation and NASA's ASRS non-punitive reporting system show that shifting the focus of improvement from individual blame to system design, and repositioning accountability, allows risk signals to accumulate. A leader who looks at "what" is not a leader who avoids accountability; rather, they are someone who first analyzes causes, separates systemic and individual factors, and holds individuals accountable strictly to their share.

When problems arise, the first question a leader asks typically splits into "Who was in charge?" and "What happened?", through which members learn how the organization handles mistakes. Data such as Gallup's 2026 report showing 22% manager engagement, DDI's 2025 survey showing 29% direct supervisor trust, and a September 2025 survey by Daejeon Metropolitan Corporation where "Take responsibility for this yourself" ranked as the number one taboo phrase, indicate that the costs of blame-driven leadership are rising. Edmondson's 1996 hospital study and 1999 study of 51 teams, along with Google's Project Aristotle, consistently confirm that teams with high psychological safety report and learn from more mistakes. Deming's 94-to-6 estimation and NASA's ASRS non-punitive reporting system show that shifting the focus of improvement from individual blame to system design, and repositioning accountability, allows risk signals to accumulate. A leader who looks at "what" is not a leader who avoids accountability; rather, they are someone who first analyzes causes, separates systemic and individual factors, and holds individuals accountable strictly to their share.
94% of Problems Stem from S…
KBR Access
KBR Article content is available to Premium members only
This content is available exclusively to Premium members. Premium comes as a 1-month pass (₩34,900, one-time payment, no auto-renewal) or a monthly subscription (₩29,900/month) — both available via Toss Payments. Premium unlocks core content including ESG, KBR Articles, and KBR Analysis.
FREE ACCOUNT · NO CARD REQUIRED
Create a free KBR account
Creating a KBR account is free and takes about a minute — no card required. You'll come straight back to this page once you're done.
KBR NEWSLETTER
Sign up for free and get the KBR Newsletter!
Sign up and opt in to the newsletter to receive KBR's curated business and economic insights by email.
RELATED CONTENT
Related Content
Lego Released 330 New Products in Half a Year and Grew Operating Profit by 22%: The Operating Structure That Handled High-Mix Innovation
PremiumWhy Toyota Gives Frontline Workers the Authority to Stop Production Lines: The Management Structure That Prevents the Spread of Defects
PremiumHow Do a Organization's Core Values Impact Organizational Performance?
PremiumWhere Did the Time Saved by AI Go... Performance Standards Management Must Change
PremiumWhat Determines a Good Leader… 5 Standards That Must Be Established Before Data

