ESG POLICY & STRATEGY
Are Korean Companies' ESG Management Strategies Properly Aligned with Global Standards?
An analysis suggests that what Korean companies must pay attention to is the shift in the due diligence method required by the CSDDD, as formal due diligence such as 'sending the same questionnaire to all tier-1 suppliers' is no longer justified, and the principle of risk-based due diligence has become much clearer. Korean companies generating a certain level of revenue or more within the EU are subject to both the CSRD and the CSDDD, and subsidiaries of Korean companies within the EU are also subject to the CSRD if they meet the size requirements. Under the CBAM, carbon emissions translate into financial costs, and the combined effect of production and carbon costs determines competitiveness. In particular, the EU may apply conservative default values to companies lacking an MRV (Measurement, Reporting, and Verification) system, imposing additional costs that could severely undermine their competitiveness.

<p c…
KBR Access
Read this ESG article now
Buy this article for ₩3,900 (30 days of access), or get KBR+ 10 — 10 paid articles for ₩9,900 (₩990 each). KBR Members (free sign-up) read one paid article free every month.
✓ No account needed · Checkout is in Korean
Best value
KBR+ 10 · ₩9,900
An insight pass that opens 10 KBR+ articles, one at a time, whenever you like
10 KBR+ articles including KBR Analysis — ₩990 each. Use them within 60 days.
Get KBR+ 10KBR NEWSLETTER
Sign up for free and get the KBR Newsletter!
Sign up and opt in to the newsletter to receive KBR's curated business and economic insights by email.
LATEST IN TOPIC
Latest in this topic
EUDR Implementation Dates Vary: Coffee Exports and the Record of Raw Materials to Be Connected
EU Pay Transparency Directive Implementation in 2026: Mandatory Salary Disclosure and Strategy for South Korean Companies
Emissions Rise Despite More Renewables: The Missing Time Dimension in Corporate Power StrategiesRelated Content

